Mandated Harms: The Day of the Dead

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
November 2, 2021 | 45 Comments


  1. ‘More worrying will be the arrangements for when patients can write into their own records.’
    There is still oposition from medics who want to block access to medical files. This App could though be an opportunity for people to see what code has been used
    and to challenge and add their own entries – which will give some idea of how much they conflict with those of clinicians who have mis-coded and so hidden the truth of medication/treatment harms. The allowance of redaction is a loophole as there is no obligation to tell what and why that is being done and of course the old right to with hold info as potentialy harmful to self or others – again with no obligation to tell or explain. It does to some extent dispense with the reluctance of a lot of people to ask for their medical records for various reasons. We’ll have to see how it pans out, what loopholes are sought to crawl through – depends on enough people willing to use the App – and start challenging an publicising ‘inaccuracies’ . Hce asked Welsh health minister if it applies to Wales – no reply .

    Technology Patients to see new entries in their GP record through NHS App from December
    29 October 2021
    Patients who have downloaded the NHS App will start to have online access to new entries in their GP record by the end of this year.

    NHS Digital have announced that patients whose practices use TPP will be first to have access to their GP notes through the NHS App from December.
    For EMIS practices, patients will be able to view new entries in their health records from early 2022. Discussions are still ongoing about Vision clinical systems.
    The scheme will be expanded from 2022 to enable patients to request their historical coded records through the NHS App.
    GPs are being advised to consider ‘the impact of each entry’, including documents and test results, as they add them to a patient’s record.
    The move supports existing GMS contract requirements “to promote and offer online patient access to all future information, unless exceptional circumstances apply”, the announcement said.
    From April 2020, GP practices have had to make online access to the full historic digital record available to patients on request.
    GPs had warned that digitising past records would cause a lot of extra workload but the BMA has stressed they did not expect practices to fund the work themselves.
    A series of events run by NHSX have been announced this week and next with more to follow to help practices plan for the changes.
    GPs and practice staff need to be aware that patients will be able to see their future records and understand how to manage the changes including that sensitive information may need to be redacted as it is entered onto the clinical system.
    In announcing the move NHS Digital said research shows that increasing numbers of patients want easy access to their health records and personal information, including 80% of the 18 million NHS App users.
    ‘Better access supports patients as partners in managing their health, and will help reduce queries to practices such as on negative test results and referral letters,’ it added.
    Dr Grant Ingrams, a GP in Leicester, said: ‘The regulations say that this will occur only once there is redaction software in place. But lots have raised the significant amount of time it will take to check through every record. More worrying will be the arrangements for when patients can write into their own records.’
    Since May, patients have also been able to use the NHS App to prove their Covid vaccination status.

    Getting ready for patients to have access to their future data
    Nhsx Blue On White 600px 1

    The change supports NHS Long Term Plan commitments to provide patients with digital access to their health records.
    It means GPs and practice staff will need to consider the impact of each entry, including documents and test results, as they add them to a patient’s record. Patients will not see personal information – such as positive test results – until they have been checked and filed, giving GPs the chance to contact and speak to patients first.

    To find out what this means for you and what you need to do next, join us for an upcoming event.
    Further sessions will be added over the coming weeks – this training will continue weekly until 17 December 2021 and sessions will include step by step advice for dealing with results, processing documents, registrations, GP2GP transfer and setting up and promoting online services.
    GP staff and operational staff
    Session Date Time Link
    Getting ready for patients to have access to their future data 03 November 21 1.30pm – 2.30pm Fully booked
    Getting ready for patients to have access to their future data 04 November 21 10am – 11am Fully booked
    Getting ready for patients to have access to their future data 04 November 21 3pm – 4pm Fully booked

    Primary care commissioners
    Session Date Time Link
    Safeguarding and Caldicott leads
    Session Date Time Link
    Getting ready for patients to have access to their future data 3 November 21 12:30pm – 1:30pm Register here
    For any queries please contact the NHSX Implementation Team:
    This is a project developed by Health and Social Services but there’s no mention of Social services in the publicity.

    By the way there was a tiny insert into a newscast recently – blink and you’ve missed it . June Raine of MHRA was asking for people to report adverse effects to vacc That was all – what’s going on. There are more accounts of harms getting publicity on line than the MHRA in UK has been admitting.

  2. More News from the Cess Pit of pharma It’s too long to include whole article..They deserve to end up in any imaginary version of hell.
    Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
    BMJ 2021; 375 doi: (Published 02 November 2021)

    Paul D Thacker, investigative journalist

    Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports

    In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.1

    But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails……….

  3. “Pfizer don’t do science they do business”

    FDA Committee Members Reviewing Pfizer Vaccine For Children Have Worked For Pfizer, Have Big Pfizer Connections


    “By the way there was a tiny insert into a newscast recently – blink and you’ve missed it . June Raine of MHRA was asking for people to report adverse effects to vacc That was all – what’s going on”

    Yes BBC R4 news briefing – I thought the same

  4. Yesterday’s Expert Panel discussion on Federal Vaccine Mandates and Vaccine Injuries can now be viewed in full. It runs at just under 3 hours and 20 minutes.

    I grabbed some screenshots I posted yesterday on Twitter during the meeting. The video is worth watching, I watched it all as it went out live. The screenshots are summaries of many of the vaccine injured and safety advocates.

  5. If the organizations who are responsible for overseeing what medicos do, were honest, we would not have the corruption we see today.
    If the deceased could speak, they would have so many stories to tell.
    The ones who are very cluey, do not need to be further hoodwinked by some professionals who do not write or say things the way it is meant to be. If we don’t get rid of the corruption, on all levels, what HOPE does the human race have. I’m sick and tired of some people in the health care system who tolerate utter nonsense and unethical practices. It makes the honest ones look dirty.

  6. Medical Science and Technology #earlytreatments

    1/ Once again, @MaryanneDemasi posts an excellent piece on the credibility blow to @pfizer #COVID19 vaccine and the silence of the media. You should support her work. What is this story telling us about #PandemicJournalism?
    @serenatinari @RecheckHealth

    A credibility blow to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine

    4 November 2021|COVID-19, Industry influence

    By Maryanne Demasi, PhD

    Data kept secret

    Repeated requests for access to COVID-19 vaccine data by independent researchers has proved futile.

    “Data is the bedrock of science. If you cannot see the data, it’s not science, it’s business,” said Prof David Healy, from McMaster University, Canada.

    For years, Dr Healy has treated patients who have experienced adverse drug events and is one of the few people to access internal drug company documents and trial data which have been subpoenaed in major legal disputes.

    “Pfizer is not offering scientific information, it is offering you promotional material, they’re not in the business of looking after your safety, they’re in the business of selling treatments and making money,” said Prof Healy.

    Dr Peter Doshi, a professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland, has been fighting the lack of data transparency for over a decade.

    “If you are interested in analysing the data for Pfizer’s trial, you will have to wait until May 2025 before you can even request it from the company,” says Prof Doshi.

    “What we’re following is not a process based on scientific data. We’re following a process where the data are treated as secret and, in my view, there is something very unscientific about that,” adds Prof Doshi.

    In 2015, the Institute of Medicine published a consensus study calling for a culture change in which data sharing became the norm, not the exception, but not enough has changed. 

    “The point I am trying to make is very simple,” said Prof Doshi. “The data from Covid vaccines are not available and won’t be available for years. Yet, we are not just ‘asking’ but ‘mandating’ millions of people to take these vaccines.” 

    We are told to ‘follow the science’….but we do so, without data. A healthy dose of transparency is the only remedy.

    • Susanne in thebmj r.r. Re: Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
      Dear Editor
      All through the pandemic there have been high levels of what most people accept as corruption and consequent mistrust. Even many of those who had doubts about the vaccines eventually accepted them, partly in some cases because of the threats of increasing policies of social isolation. There is doubt in the population about the need for a ‘booster’ making three vaccinations in the space of a year. But many of those hesitating or even gladly accepting the booster have had no opportunity to read the continuing articles published throughout in The BMJ in order to make as informed decision as possible.
      There have been no news items on this report. There was an odd one sentence item in a R4 newscast a few days ago asking people to report adverse effects. That was all that was said – no explanation as to why it was said – now it could be assumed that there was prior knowledge that this report was to be published. It is also pretty useless to ask people to report without advising how. The Yellow Card scheme is not widely known or used, certainly not to the extent needed. There seems to be no reliable way data is being collected. Or to update new symptoms. People, including, crucially, doctors who are getting a lot of blame right now, need to know the truth imperfect as it is when some better respect and a trusted collaboration between all of us is so urgently needed.
      Dear Editor:
      This article is interesting from at least two vantage points. First, it pointed out the problems associated with profit-driven research companies that often cut corners on their processes. But I think more importantly, it unfortunately allowed those who doubt vaccine safety and efficacy to reinforce their pre-existing biases against the COVID vaccines and what has in fact been demonstrated in real world data – that they are safe and are effective but do wane in efficacy, thus requiring eventual booster/third doses (and perhaps ongoing doses at some as yet to be determined frequency).
      Let’s not throw out the baby with the bathwater. We need better oversight of research companies for sure. But in the end, Pfizer and Moderna (and J&J and AZ to a lesser extent) have provided the world with excellent protection against COVID-19 disease and death
      04 November 2021
      George D Bussey
      Hawaii, USA
      The level of irresponsible behavior demonstrated by the Ventavia executives, borders on criminality and needs close scrutiny of the entire research organization industry. Pfizer is equally culpable for this monumental breach of research integrity and data manipulation. And where was FDA in all this? To add insult to injury Pfizer rehired Ventavia to perform additional trials. The whole fiasco needs a congressional enquiry as it directly affects the life of hundreds of millions of people who were given the vaccine
      03 November 2021
      Abdul Wase
      Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine
      Dayton, OH
      Re: Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
      Dear Editor
      It’s hard to understand how we can trust the safety data provided by Pfizer [1]; ……

  7. Annie, we need more honest journalists like Maryanne Demasi coming forward now, to warn the people about the risks involved in having the vaccine. If you are not informed about all the risks, why should innocent people give consent to a medical treatment they know very little about.
    David Healy, is highlighting a fundamental principle that is substratum to any medicine or vaccine. He clearly states that if we do not have access to all the data, this is all about business. If big corporations put profits before the safety of people how can this science be perceived as ethical and moral?
    Peter Doshi, has been fighting for data transparency for almost ten years. Why do we have to wait till 2025 for the complete data to come out for the covid-19 vaccine?
    If we have been lied to, by the very people who have a vested interested in our safety and well-being and it turns out to me a major fraud, all people responsible should be held accountable for all the maiming and deaths of innocent people.
    Cover-ups, lies, denials, excuses and coincidences should no longer be the modus operandi of Big Pharma, medicos, Governments, some epidemiologists, some scientists and any other stake holders involved in this kind of illegal activity.
    They should be held accountable and prosecuted for misinforming and deceiving the public.
    There is something so erroneous about withholding any kind of data from the public. To me it is CRIMINAL!
    Hundreds and thousands of people died of the seasonal flu before the Covid-19 pandemic came to the fore.
    It never made the front headlines nor did it raise alarm bells within the domain of the Health establishment.
    Why are more deaths occurring, since people have had the covid-19 vaccine?
    Are we missing something significant or are we being hoodwinked by media and those in positions we trust?
    The experts got it wrong when AIDS came on the scene and I can see History repeating itself again!
    We want answers and if people can see beyond the smoke and mirrors, we should not give up on our civil liberties that have been eroded by distortion, manipulation, deceit and lies.
    Exposing the tyrants for who and what they are, is going to come out sooner than we think.
    When we have experts in the field who know their stuff, there is no telling what will happen once that critical information leaks.

    By the way Chris, I appreciate you sharing the video of that nurse coming forward and speaking the TRUTH about the covid- 19 vaccines and what she is witnessing. Which concerns me: How many adverse events are not being reported/documented as the covid-19 vaccine inducing harm or death.
    She is saying it as it is and is not afraid of the consequences to come………… :'( I feel for her! It must take lots of guts and courage to come out and say it as it is. I hope she get rewarded for speaking up as for some whistle- blowers, sadly, this is not the case!
    Whistle-blowers, world-wide, please come forward and don’t be afraid to speak up. We can STOP evil by speaking up.

    “He who passively accepts evil
    is as much involved in it as he who
    helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil
    without protesting against it,
    is really cooperating with it.”
    ~ Martin Luther King

  8. Covid booster vaccines: what you need to know – British Heart … › news › covid-booster-vaccine
    3 days ago — The Pfizer, Moderna and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines have all been approved for use as booster jabs by the UK medicines regulator, the MHRA. More …

    People in UK have been shouted at to Get the Booster Until today 3 days later 4th Nov we are being told there is a hold up of the booster due to lack of supplies. Oh yea….a few days ago J R of MHRA was requesting the public to report adverse effects to vaccines.

  9. Dr. Stephen V. Sobel – psychiatrist

    CAUGHT ON TAPE: Dr. Stephen V. Sobel, MD was recorded by an unvaxxed patient after he began attacking her for exercising her God-given, inherent Constitutional freedom to make her own personal choices about her “vaccine” status.

    I wish more people would record psychiatrists coercing and bullying – recording is very cringe inducing indeed.

    Dr. Bryan Ardis | Hospital Protocols Are Murdering Americans by Prescribing Remdesivir Which Causes Renal Failure

    referring to hospitalised covid 19 patients

  10. I’m having my special afternoon soup now with a few things added to it. It does seem to help ameliorate the Fluoxetine withdrawal symptoms. I did have a peculiar issue crop up with tachycardia during mild exercise just walking to the local Coop after I had the second Pfizer vaccine. I decided that might have been an effect of taking valerian powder in my morning coffee. However given other peoples reports I am uncertain as to the cause. It was very odd I was getting my heart rate shoot upto 160+ for a mild walk and I had to stop and steady myself a few times. Perhaps the tachycardia I experienced in May was a symtom caused by the vaccine I really can’t say for certain. I saw this report today.

    I’m still feeling a bit unusual so I probably wouldn’t do much etter than Joe Biden, I don’t really having a go at his job currently.

    I’m going for the second stage of tapering from 2.5mg of liquid Fluoxetine at the reduced rate of 0.1mg per week at some point. I went down from 5mg in July to 2.5mg in October. I sat at 2.5mg for October as I started to feel noticeably worse.

      • I’m doing my best over here, I still get quite a few moments which I refer to as 1202 alarms cropping up when I navigate my external environment. I don’t think having alot of people with ssri protracted withdrawals will be very socailly beneficial. I have my fingers crossed that one of these days I’ll be back to normal.

  11. Samizdat It’s free. to subscribe Is asking for accounts of vaccine harms. The have already published a huge number online in detail.
    In 2020 ‘The unofficial system known as “samizdat” — the clandestine copying and distribution of literature banned by the Soviet State — planted the seeds that ultimately brought down communist dictatorship. Today, we launch “The Defender,” which we hope will prove to be the death-dealing samizdat to today’s burgeoning corporate totalitarianism.

    Censorship is the leading threat to liberal democracy globally. Censorship is the civil rights incursion that allows the imposition of every other suppression of our rights and liberties. The censorship in service to corporate and authoritarian interests that now defines every corporate news and social media platform, imperils our ideals, our values, our democracy, our liberty and threatens to trample our humanity.

    2020 Allied to Defender ‘Children’s Health Defense is launching The Defender, an online news site to evade official censorship, to report fact-based news and sponsor the kind of honest debate that terrifies the new generation of corporate and government commissars.On Nov. 16, Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. will release his new book — “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”
    Doesn’t Bill Gates own facebook…….
    Instagram bans Robert F Kennedy Jr over Covid vaccine posts

    Published11 February 21
    Instagram has removed the account of Robert F Kennedy Jr for making false claims about coronavirus and vaccines.
    The nephew of late President John F Kennedy had his account permanently taken down “for repeatedly sharing debunked claims”, Facebook, which owns Instagram, said in a statement.
    Facebook has vowed to remove false claims about Covid-19 vaccines to prevent “imminent physical harm”.

    ( J Kennedy )He chairs Children’s Health Defense, a group that expresses scepticism about the health benefits of vaccines. He also campaigned against the immunisation of measles during a resurgence of the infection.
    Speaking last year at a conference for the National Vaccine Information Centre, a controversial group accused of spreading misinformation on vaccines, Mr Kennedy said people were hearing his message and “those seeds are landing on very fertile ground”.

  12. Open wide – For Pfizer Pill

    November 5, 20212:54 PM GMTLast Updated a minute ago
    Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
    Pfizer says antiviral pill cuts risk of severe COVID-19 by 89%
    By Deena Beasley
    Trial stopped early after high success rate
    Results appear to surpass those of rival Merck drug
    Pfizer to submit interim data to FDA before Nov. 25
    Nov 5 (Reuters) – A trial of Pfizer Inc’s (PFE.N) experimental antiviral pill for COVID-19 was stopped early after the drug was shown to cut by 89% the chances of hospitalization or death for adults at risk of developing severe disease, the company said on Friday.

    The results appear to surpass those seen with Merck & Co Inc’s (MRK.N) pill, molnupiravir, which was shown last month to halve the likelihood of dying or being hospitalized for COVID-19 patients also at high risk of serious illness.

    Full trial data is not yet available from either company.

    But ‘very very large’ is very very wooly language
    “Just stunning results,” Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University “Implications of effective therapeutics for ending the pandemic are very, very large.”
    Only just under half of populations declining vax accept pills – guess some wld -good move Pfizer
    Infectious disease experts stress that preventing COVID-19 through wide use of vaccines remains the best way to control the pandemic, but only 58% of Americans are fully vaccinated and access in many parts of the world is limited.
    “Vaccines are going to be the most effective and reliable tool that we have in this pandemic,”….”These oral medications are going to augment our ability to really reduce the risk of severe disease, hospitalization and death, which is huge, but it won’t prevent infection.”

    Rollup get yr stocks n shares
    Shares in Pfizer, which also makes one of the mostly widely used COVID-19 vaccines, were up 7.6% to $47.19 at 1445 GMT, while Merck’s were down 8.5% to $82.83. Shares of other vaccine makers also took a hit, with Moderna Inc (MRNA.O), Pfizer’s German partner BioNTech SE and Novavax (NVAX.O) all down 10-18%.
    Meanwhile, travel stocks rose, with American Airlines (AAL.O), United Airlines (UAL.O), Delta Air Lines (DAL.N), cruise operators Carnival Corp (CCL.N) and Norwegian Cruise (NCLH.N) rising between 4% and 5.9%.
    Pfizer said it planned to submit interim trial results for its pill, which is given in combination with an older antiviral called ritonavir, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as part of the emergency use application it opened in October.
    Thanksgiving treats
    That filing is expected to be submitted before the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday on Nov. 25, Pfizer Chief Executive Albert Bourla said in an interview with CNBC.
    The company said it expects to manufacture at least 50 million courses of the oral treatment by the end of 2022.
    The combination treatment, which will have the brand name Paxlovid, consists of three pills given twice daily.

    The planned analysis of 1,219 patients in Pfizer’s study looked at hospitalizations or deaths among people diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 with at least one risk factor for developing severe disease, such as obesity or older age.
    It found that 0.8% of those given Pfizer’s drug within three days of symptom onset were hospitalized and none had died by 28 days after treatment. That compared with a hospitalization rate of 7% for placebo patients. There were also seven deaths in the placebo group.
    How it ‘worked out’
    Rates were similar for patients treated within five days of symptoms – 1% of the treatment group was hospitalized, compared with 6.7% for the placebo group, which included 10 deaths. Bourla said that works out to being 85% effective.
    A panel of outside experts to the FDA is scheduled to meet Nov. 30 to discuss Merck’s pill, which was approved by British regulators in a world first on Thursday. Pfizer said it did not know if Paxlovid would be reviewed at the same meeting.
    Antivirals need to be given as early as possible, before an infection takes hold in order to be most effective. Merck tested its drug within five days of symptom onset.
    “This means that we have time to treat people and really provide a benefit from a public health perspective,

    Urgh -dont run out of loo roll
    The company did not detail side effects of the treatment, but said adverse events happened in about 20% of both treatment and placebo patients. Ritonavir’s possible side effects include nausea and diarrhea.
    And for the children
    White House Chief of Staff Ronald Klain said the prospect of an antiviral this effective along with rollout of vaccines for children between the age of 5 and 11 underway could be a turning point week in fight against COVID-19. Klain cautioned that the pill still needed to be reviewed by the FDA.

    They could of course ‘suggest’ anything
    Report ad”These data suggest that our oral antiviral candidate, if approved by regulatory authorities, has the potential to save patients’ lives, reduce the severity of COVID-19 infections, and eliminate up to nine out of ten hospitalizations,” Bourla said in a statement.

    Pfizer said it was currently expecting to produce more than 180,000 packs by the end of 2021 and at least 50 million packs by the end of 2022, of which 21 million would be produced in the first half.

    Gobble gobble
    Pfizer is also studying whether its pill could be used by people without risk factors for serious COVID-19 as well as to prevent coronavirus infection in people exposed to the virus.

    Reporting by Deena Beasley Additional reporting by Ankur Banerjee in Bengaluru Editing by Anil D’Silva and Mark Potter

    • Hysterical rampaging ‘health’ tyranny – what next… let me guess – gene based ‘vaccines’ for ‘ADHD’ anxiety, depression and mass metaverse induced psychosis

  13. Trudo Lemmens Retweeted


    ICYMI: Media silence about #PfizerGate vaccine trial scandal lets FDA and Pfizer off the hook

    PfizerGate: Media silence about vaccine trial scandal lets FDA and Pfizer off the hook

    In contrast, the same story was widely reported in the Russian and French media, and on Wednesday was trending on Twitter under #PfizerGate.

    Editors’ widespread failure to pick up on the story is deeply problematic.

    Third, it undermines confidence in democratic institutions and public health bodies because it gives citizens – including this writer – the impression that mainstream media are deliberately ignoring a big story in order to avoid fueling vaccine hesitancy. (For example, the Guardian on the same day did find space to run a non-story on the startup of a tiny new Covid trial.) As a result, English and German language discussion of the implications of the BMJ revelations for personal and public health choices is now led by Russian state-sponsored media, extremist websites, and whoever posts the most shocking content on social media. Ironically, these sources seem the least likely to highlight that the documented problems involved only three trial sites accounting for around 1,000 of the Pfizer trial’s 44,000 participants.

  14. Dr Aseem Malhotra FRCP

    BMJ whistle blower investigation reveals evidence of falsifying data in pivotal Pfizer Covid vaccine trial

    ‘Where is the criminal FBI investigation?’

    ‘Drug companies paid fines of $13 billion between 2009 – 2014 and nothing has been done to rectify the problem’
    0:04 / 1:42
    Here’s To The Rebels
    Replying to
    Awesome and fearless Doc
    Yellow heartYellow heartYellow heart

    NO to vax coercion until Phase3 trials conclude and INTERNAL DATA released for independent review!
    7:58 pm · 4 Nov 2021·Twitter for Android

  15. Transparency and data – UKHSA’s vaccines report

    Vaccines work. They have played a critical role in breaking the link between infection and severe outcomes, and we should express our gratitude to the scientists who developed life-saving vaccines against COVID-19 and to those who work tirelessly every day to roll out the vaccine programme at pace, across the country.

    In this blog I would like to explain how we use different data sets to look at the impact of vaccination in the population.

    The UK Health Security Agency is committed to openness around data and has been at the forefront of publishing evidence to show the effectiveness of the UK vaccination programme. We were first to show that COVID-19 vaccines offer high protection against the Delta variant of the virus and this data has been regularly shared with policymakers and the public.

    Juan Gérvas

    5 min video. Covi19 vaccines/vacunas Peter Doshi in action/Peter Doshi en vivo Associate Editor of the British Medical Journal, bona fide expert in drug approval processes and associated data analysis.… (with subtitles, it helps; con subtítulos, que ayudan)

    Here is an Associate Editor of the British Medical Journal, bona fide expert in drug approval processes and associated data analysis – so cannot be censored, or ignored. Dr. Peter Doshi in an official meeting called by Senator Ron Johnson, gives a crucial 5 minutes calling for a return to critical and rational thinking. A hugely important discussion that all critical thinkers should be having. DOWNLOAD it here for sharing: Original link:

  16. Cocktails time.
    MHRA to assess Pfizer’s at-home Covid treatment found to be ‘89% effective’
    Sofia Lind
    05 November 2021

    The UK medicines regulator will assess Pfizer’s novel antiviral Covid treatment, after clinical trials showed it to be 89% effective at reducing hospitalisation of high-risk patients.
    The UK has procured 250,000 doses of the treatment, which is an at-home oral antiviral cocktail to be taken three times daily
    The phase 2/3 trial showed that upon starting treatment within 3-5 days of developing symptoms, 28 days in there were no deaths among the trial group, while 10 deaths occurred among those receiving a placebo.
    Pfizer said it would now ‘cease further enrolment into the study due to the overwhelming efficacy demonstrated in these results’ and is planning to submit data for emergency authorisation from regulators ‘as soon as possible’.
    The news comes as the UK Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) became the first drugs regulator in the world to approve Merck’s novel at-home antiviral drug, molnupiravir (brand name Lagevrio) this week.
    Merck’s drug was found to be effective in reducing the risk of hospitalisation or death for at-risk non-hospitalised adults with mild to moderate Covid-19 by 50% in clinical trials, and the UK has procured 480,000 doses.
    …‘We have procured 250,000 doses of this promising treatment on behalf of the whole UK and our independent medicines regulator, the MHRA, will now assess its safety, quality and effectiveness
    However, Pfizer said in future its ‘protease inhibitor’ treatment, which is the ‘first oral antiviral of its kind’, could also be used to ‘reduce the probability of infection following exposure’.

  17. PS As vast numbers of people are on other medications taken orally wouldn’t taking this anti viral pill three times a day with potential side effect of nausea and diarrhea be rxisky?

  18. Mean while Covid-19 seems to have gone

    Sandra Weeden – twitter

    ” Odd! Anyone know more about the REMOVAL of Covid-19 from the Notification of Infectious diseases? ”

    Could it be that the numbers published each week on pg 14 of the PDF were so low throughout the ‘pandemic’ it was getting way too obvious with more and more people being switched on to it.

  19. Who did the EU deals


    “The #EU bowed to lobbyists, conceded huge profit margins on #vaccine to #Pfizer and #Moderna. Instead of 1 euro, they got 22 #euros. Citizens have the right to know who negotiated on behalf of the #EU! #ID #Corona #Transparency #Pfizergate”!5809572/


    When the EU Commission took on the task of procuring Covid-19 vaccines on behalf of the Union, the 27 member states set up a steering committee to oversee the tenders. At the same time, they appointed a seven-member team to lead negotiations with industry. France, Spain, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Poland each sent a representative.

    These agreed to purchase 4.6 billion doses, thus securing the vaccine supply for all 448 million EU citizens. But in return, they bowed to the demands of the manufacturers and granted large profit margins to the pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna. They collect 19.50 and 22 euros per vaccine dose, respectively. Yet the production of the modern mRNA vaccine costs only about one euro per shot, as a study by Imperial College London shows. To this must be added the development costs. But even these were largely financed from the public purse.

    But although so many billions of euros of taxpayers’ money are being handed out freely, EU citizens are not supposed to know who is negotiating on their behalf. If the persons were to become known, they could come “under pressure,” says the EU Commissioner responsible, Stella Kyriakides, justifying the secrecy. And that could “jeopardize the negotiation process and its goal of gaining access to a safe and affordable Covid 19 vaccine,” she said in response to a parliamentary question.

    The EU Parliament does not want to accept this and explicitly demands the disclosure of both the names of the negotiators and the contracts they agreed upon. “Transparency is a basic requirement to ensure the legitimacy of joint procurement in the EU,” said Spanish conservative MEP Dolors Montserrat, who drafted the parliamentary report.

    Connections to the pharmaceutical industry

    The public has the right to know who is negotiating on behalf of the EU,” says Olivier Hoedeman, head of the Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO), a non-governmental organization that monitors the influence of industry in Brussels. Only by naming those responsible, he says, is it possible to “assess their potential conflicts of interest.” That’s why the Investigate Europe (IE) team of journalists has been looking into the identity of the secret dealmakers.

    Swedish negotiator Richard Bergström was the easiest to find. As the country’s vaccine coordinator, he makes no secret of his involvement in the EU negotiating team. He is the only one of those involved who initially responded to IE’s questions. “I don’t see the need for this secrecy because my government feels that it can’t be secret that I’m doing this job,” he explained back in September.

    Bergström didn’t always work for the Swedish government, however. He spent nearly three decades in the private pharmaceutical sector, including five years as head of the European lobbying association Efpia. Asked about that resume, he was evasive: “That was a long time ago. The results proved that we were pretty good negotiators, I don’t want to talk about myself.”

    But Bergström maintains ties to the pharmaceutical industry to this day. According to his information on Linkedin, he is a senior partner at Hölzle Buri Partners Consulting (HBPC) and managing director at Bergström Consulting GmbH. HBPC says it supports the U.S. pharmaceutical association PhRMA. Its members include AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and Sanofi – all companies that have vaccine contracts with the EU.

    In turn, one of the managing directors of Bergström Consulting is Walter Peter Hölzle, owner of HBPC and former head of the Swiss pharmaceutical association Vips. HBPC and Bergström Consulting even have the same address in Zug, Switzerland.

    In addition, Bergström was until recently responsible for customer development at PharmaCCX, which he co-founded in 2016. The company develops solutions that “facilitate business between payers and pharmaceutical companies.” In February 2021, when he was already an EU negotiator, Bergström appeared in a promotional video with Nathan Sigworth, his partner at PharmaCCX at the time, and openly admitted: “I was the chief lobbyist for pharma in Brussels.”

    Nevertheless, Bergström, like all the other EU negotiators, signed a declaration that there were no conflicts of interest. How that fits with his ties to the pharmaceutical industry apparently did not concern the EU Commission. People close to the negotiations told IE that EU officials often drew on Bergström’s expertise. “He was the most knowledgeable representative from the beginning,” asserts one of the insiders.

    One senior health official from a Nordic country even says he “has skills that are of great importance in negotiations. He knows how far you can go.” That doesn’t convince lobbying expert Olivier Hoedeman of CEO. (Corporate Europe Observatory) Bergström “clearly has conflicts of interest and should never have been part of the joint negotiating team,” he criticizes. “He is ideologically on the side of Big Pharma and their model of monopoly patents.”

    The other EU governments elected representatives without direct links to the pharmaceutical industry. The Spanish authorities appointed María Jesús Lamas as a member of the steering committee and César Hernández García as a member of the negotiating team. Both are at the helm of the Spanish Medicines Agency (AEMPS).

    Germany’s Ministry of Health remains silent

    The Dutch government selected Roland Driece for both roles. He is director of international affairs at the Dutch Ministry of Health. In Italy, Health Ministry epidemiologist Giovanni Rezza confirmed that he is on the steering committee. In contrast, the Italian government would not say who is on the negotiating team for the country.

    In Poland, people familiar with the matter assume that the negotiators work for URPL, the country’s drug agency. But a spokesman declined to comment. None of those named was willing to comment on the progress of the negotiations or the high prices.

    The French government, in turn, sent officials from the Ministry of Economy and Finance. Two names are familiar to insiders: Pierre Cunéo for the joint negotiating team and Edgar Tilly for the steering committee. Both are members of the French Covid 19 vaccine task force. Cunéo was most recently director of Opale Defense, a consortium charged with building France’s new defense ministry. He was first publicly linked to vaccine procurement at a Senate hearing in June 2021. Tilly is a former speechwriter for French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire. The government declined to confirm the names.

    In Germany, too, the Ministry of Health refuses to provide any information. Those in the know report that Thomas Müller, head of the department for pharmaceuticals, and Thiemo Steinrücken, one of his deputies, are on board for the federal government. According to the report, Müller sits on the steering committee, while Steinrücken is “responsible for pretty much everything to do with the procurement of vaccines.”

    The mouthpiece of the pharmaceutical industry

    At the EU level, Germans have often acted as mouthpieces for the pharmaceutical industry, claim several people who were present at EU negotiations on vaccine policy. “Germany is lobbying for the interests of the industry, especially internationally,” says one. And the Pfizer group is “the absolute winner in this situation. They can dictate the rules. Because they’ve proven to be the most reliable seller, they can afford to charge what they want.” Pfizer and its German partner, Biontech, then became the EU’s main suppliers in the latest round of contracts, with 1.8 billion doses ordered.

    To prepare for future pandemics, the federal government now plans to contractually secure a production capacity of 600 million vaccine doses per year with manufacturers, one-third of the planned production for the entire EU. This is according to a document from the federal government’s Vaccines Taskforce, which has been declared “strictly confidential,” and which has been made available to IE.

    According to this, those responsible are still exclusively pursuing the national interest. The future agreements contain the obligation to establish “production facilities in Germany,” it says. A “transferability to the EU” is to be possible only “in case of need.” Responsibility for global distribution is not mentioned.”

  20. Out of the ‘Frying Pan’ – in to the ‘Fire’ …

    How to avoid after-effects of jabs? Think positive!

    Last week I asked if any of you had experienced side effects from vaccinations, but many readers took the opportunity to tell me what you do to avoid feeling bad after jabs.

    And I was surprised by how many are convinced by the power of simply believing you won’t become unwell.

    It sounds odd but, judging by your letters, positive thinking seems to work.
    Some told of saying things like ‘You will be absolutely fine, you are strong and healthy’ before having their jabs, while others credit their generally positive disposition.

    I know many people who swear by the positive mantras they say in the mirror every morning – with some claiming that it helps them get through various kinds of challenges.

    There’s probably little scientific evidence behind it, but if it works for you, keep doing it!

    Juan Gérvas Retweeted

    MJ Fdez Sanmamed

    Senator Johnson held a panel discussion on November 2021 with doctors, medical researchers who have treated COVID-19 vaccine injuries, and patients who have experienced adverse events. They ask for science, transparency and repair

    Vaccine Mandates Expert Panel Highlights –

    “Those who did what everybody asked them to do” – Sen. Ron Johnson

  21. Tens of thousands of people have been killed or badly injured by Covid vaccines – so begins the post above. Having read the whole post and then watched the full meeting about Covid mandates and injuries, I felt that here, at last, was an issue that was relevant to every single one of us. Gone would be the lack of interest shown towards any news of AD injuries with the usual “Don’t need to hear it, I don’t take them” attitude; now “WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER”; old or young, of whatever gender, colour or creed, ALL would want to hear the astonishing facts being shared with us.
    To this end, I posted the you tube full meeting version of Covid mandates and harms and, later, the abridged Highwire video of Covid vaccine harms from the same meeting, to our Facebook group “Feeling Blue?” with a caption of the importance of the information within both videos.
    Ours is now a group of 37 people – set up initially to catch anxious teens pre AD prescriptions – having a variety of reasons for joining pour group I guess but ALL having, by now, being offered at least two doses of a Covid vaccine. Surely they would feast on this information and pass it on to all their family and friends? Surely, very soon our corner of North Wales would, at least, BE AWARE of hidden dangers lurking in the jabs?
    Did my dream come true? Nope, a measly 9 people have even bothered to ” see” the message; goodness knows how few will have watched the videos. One did comment that she would set time aside to watch these with care as it’s not a topic to scan through. If only the 37 felt that way.
    What has happened to us? Are we now so self-centred that anything that has not happened to us, personally, is of no interest to us? Can we no longer imagine ourselves in the shoes of someone less fortunate than ourselves? It beggars belief that no more than a handful have even given this topic a ‘look’ when it’s been put out there in a message for them, in a message of concern!
    Well, I’m not beaten! I am about to try an experiment. So far noone in the group knows that I have not accepted my booster jab ( due to the phlebitis in my leg after the second jab). I am going to give them a blow by blow account of how it was that I made that decision – not to get anyone’s pity but just to see if a personal account from nearer home will register with more people.
    I am in no way comparing my experience with the suffering seen in the videos of course, simply trying to find out what it is that can shake the general public into action these days. Maybe I’ll end up with 0 viewers, who knows! If so, I’ll have to try a different wake up call!

    • My ‘experiment’ was too much for Facebook – they blocked the group as soon as I put my latest post up! Silenced for 30 days? – no chance!

      • Incredible Mary! They need only see a buzz word and you get taken down now. Am in awe of what you are doing up there though By the way my computer gets blocked if I use the word rxisk too many times So here’s a tease for the checkers Rxisk rxisk rxisk rxisk rxisk rxisk rxisk rxisk rxisk rxisk. Hope they read yr latest and the latest blog post..

        • What’s going on is totally ridiculous. The group is still visible – to all except to me, the administrator BUT every post with reference to ADs or Covid vaccines plus those about out contaminated water systems have been removed. All the articles had been added by using the ‘share’ facility on the various sites – why have your ‘f’ there to facilitate this sharing and then remove them when they arrive on site within a group?
          Never mind, Facebook will not keep us down for long!

  22. Children’s Health Defense
    allied to The Defender subscribe
    4:24 PM (1 hour ago)
    to me
    November 7, 2021

    3 More Reports of Teen Deaths After COVID Vaccines, as Reported Injuries Exceed 850,000

    Vaccine-Injured Speak Out, Feel Abandoned by Government Who Told Them COVID Shot Was Safe

    17 Pharma Henchmen Who Voted to Experiment on Your Kids — and How to Shun Them

    Top-Selling Drug in the World — Pfizer COVID Vaccine 2021 Sales on Track to Hit $36 Billion
    5G Harms Humans, Animals, Plants, Landmark Study Shows

    ‘Brought to You by Pfizer’: Pharma Giant Spends More on Ads, News Sponsorships, Than Research

    Prominent Scientists Go Public: ‘Fauci Fooled America’

    OSHA Gives Workers Until Jan. 4 to Comply With Biden’s COVID Vaccine Mandate, Lawmakers Tee Up Lawsuits
    We need to look out for those targeted for the initial ‘trial’ The same vulnerable groups which suffured the highest number of deaths when the pandemic began in UK and elsewhere are in the first tranch to be used as research fodder by Pfizer pills. There are many more eyes open now activating but they will still do their best to persuade without evicence

    • “The same vulnerable groups which suffured the highest number of deaths when the pandemic began in UK and elsewhere are in the first tranch to be used as research fodder by Pfizer pills.”

      Yes indeeed – within hospitals, care homes and psych hell holes – any closed culture that can be easily used for abuse.

  23. In the face of criticism, the requirement of a health pass at the entrance to the European Parliament has been temporarily suspended


    “The President of the Court of the European Union decided on Friday to temporarily suspend the imposition of the European digital certificate Covid for access to the European Parliament buildings.

    Some deputies and staff members had filed an appeal against such an imposition. These people will now be able to access the premises on the basis of a negative self-test, announced Saturday the ASBL Notre Bon Droit. “It appears necessary, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, to stay the execution of the contested decision by limiting the conditions of access of the applicants to the premises of the European Parliament to the requirement of a negative self-test,” according to the position of the European Union court, of which Belga has taken note. “In case of a positive result, this test must be followed by a PCR test. In case of a positive result of the latter test, the European Parliament may refuse the applicants access to its premises,” it states.

    The decision that was challenged by the applicants – MEPs and staff of the European Parliament – is a decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament, dated October 27, governing access to the buildings of the Parliament in its three places of work, in Strasbourg, Brussels and Luxembourg. It makes entry to the premises of the public institution conditional on the presentation of a Covid European digital certificate for all persons, whether MEPs, staff or visitors.

    This decision was then denounced by several MEPs last week, because they consider that this obligation is a serious infringement of their fundamental rights and freedoms. They then chose, in close collaboration with the ASBL Notre Bon Droit, to attack the act in court. They have just won their case with regard to the request for a provisional suspension. The president of the court took into account “the infringement of the full and active exercise of the applicants’ mandates”. He concluded that “the allegations contained in the request for interim relief, if established, justify adjusting the status quo”, until he “examines the arguments of the parties in more detail”.

    The president of the court will issue a second decision in the coming weeks regarding the request for a final stay. In addition, a petition for annulment has also been filed on the merits.

    “These legal actions aim to suspend and annul the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament, because it violates certain fundamental rights guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,” said the ASBL Notre Bon Droit. “These are not only the right to work, the right to physical integrity, the right to freedom and security, but also the right to equality and non-discrimination, and especially the right to privacy and respect for personal data,” it detailed.”

    “access of the applicants to the premises of the European Parliament to the requirement of a negative self-test,” according to the position of the European Union court, of which Belga has taken note. “In case of a positive result, this test must be followed by a PCR test. In case of a positive result of the latter test, the European Parliament may refuse the applicants access to its premises,” it states.”

    This absolutely needs to be challenged as well – where are you Dr Reiner Fuellmich – neither the laterl flow nore RT-PCR can say anything about infection or infectiousness only cell culture can do this.

  24. Those who have been maimed or have sadly passed away, need a voice
    It is a real disgrace when some people don’t listen to peoples stories and are very biased and programmed to only think one way. This is Un-Australian! I wonder if some politicians would use the same speeches, that hurt, for the vaccine/medicine injured or those who have sadly passed away The policies are incongruent with real science. Lot of hypocrisy going on that makes a joke of this pandemic. People can see things for what they are and they are not what I consider, dull-witted! Many people have SACRIFICED their good health in the name of science. We don’t want to further compromise our health. We were casualties of a Big Pharma war and we are not prepared to go back into battle again, in order to appease your one way of thinking or further compromise our health. Please do not play Russian Roulette with people’s lives. Vaccine mandates are very dangerous on legitimate medical grounds. It is unconstitutional.

  25. Hello Chris,
    It is humbling to know that there are good men like Senator Gerard Rennick, making a stand for everyone in our society.
    Rights and freedoms are being taken away from many, through no fault of their own.
    Thank you for fighting the system Gerard, together with other respected Senators and making this world a better place to live in.
    Where have you been hiding yourself, all this time?
    Thank you for fighting for us.
    I respect and support you.
    Thank you for your courage and support.
    It means so much to all of us who have been silenced for way too long.

    Thank you for educating us about the following:
    We cannot coerce people into taking a vaccine. Section 51 23A of the Constitution say that you cannot conscript people into giving the vaccine, especially in regards to medical procedures.
    Indeed, STOP playing political games with people’s health. Hear! hear!
    Thank you immensely Gerard for your fiercesome skill, diplomacy and leadership.
    Thank you to all the warriors in this world. It means so much to us.

    There is nothing more important than people who try to do the right thing. CB

Leave a Reply to annie